Contents
- Home
- News
- Question of the week
- Comment
- ‘We need renewal, and this is the moment for it’
- Giles Fraser:Try being transformed by joy
- Paul Vallely: Ending the business of dependency
- One way of growing a global mission
- Leader: Wheat and tares in Canterbury
- Lambeth and the Creed
- The trouble with silence on contraception
- How much is known about the origins of homosexuality?
- Disappearing handlebars
- Chomping on gum is costly for us all
- The Jubilee idea could save the earth
- Letters
- Real Life
- Features
- Faith
- Humour and crossword
- Pastimes
- Books
- Arts
- Media
- Gazette
back to Comment |
previous story
|
next story
|
Chomping on gum is costly for us all
It is a worthless, polluting menace — but it is worth billions, says Peter Graystone
![]() |
| CHEWING GUM proves the existence of God! I admit that I have not applied the same rigour as Thomas Aquinas to my reasoning, but, walking the streets of Croydon, which are spotted like a Dalmatian, it is the only conclusion I can draw.
Chewing gum is the supreme symbol of consumerism. In itself, it is more or less worthless. By the use of enticing packaging and lively advertising, however, it has been elevated into something highly desirable. It creates profit with every chomp, from the throwaway wrapper to the last, desultory spit. And, wherever it is consumed, it leaves a trail of trash and filth, adding about £150 million per year to the cost of cleaning the streets of Britain. Treading carefully, attempting not to stick to the pavement, one develops a conviction that there must surely be more to life than this. It is evidence that the consequences of materialism are literally too unpalatable to swallow. Were I not already persuaded of the existence of a God, I would invent one, in the desperate hope that humankind can aspire to something better. And yet a multi-million pound war to win the biggest stake in this market is under way. Wrigley’s, the owner of Spearmint, the brand that has dominated the UK market for many years, was bought last month for £11.5 billion by the confectionery giant Mars. It was a direct response to the purchase by Cadbury, five years ago, of the US business, Adams, whose Trident products have recently been launched in Britain. Sales of gum are increasing at three times the rate of chocolate. Battle is engaged. It can only get dirty. The chewing habit was picked up by early settlers of the United States, who copied the indigenous tribes who chewed spruce sap. In 1871, Thomas Adams patented the manufacture of chicle (that’s rubber — yes, it’s what you’ve got in your mouth) and ushered in the age of the munch. The first gums had no flavour, but, over the years, Mr Adams experimented by adding fruit or mint. When he launched Tutti-Frutti gum, packaged to retail in vending machines, the sales were sensational. Twenty years later, William Wrigley established his business in Chicago. He originally sold soap and baking soda, and gave away a free stick of gum with every purchase. But the gum proved more popular than the soap. Mr Wrigley reoriented the company to capitalise on this, and introduced his product to Britain in 1911. That is how a piece of rubber, so worthless that it was given away, has become a comestible of which 935 million packets were consumed by Britons last year. At ten pence per lump to remove, the cost of cleaning gum waste is about three times the cost of chewing it. For five years, the Irish government threatened a tax to fund more effective removal. Last year, under fire from the big gums of the confectionery industry, it surrendered. Instead, manufacturers pledged €7 million (£5.5 million) for an education campaign about litter. In comparison, the £600,000 funding that the UK government has won from Mars and Cadbury for a similar campaign makes efforts in this country seem toothless. The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs needs an anti-gum strategy to help clean our streets of the litter of consumerism. Need to Know: Christianity, by Peter Graystone, is published by Collins. |


.gif)
